Are the concepts of andragogy and pedagogy relevant to veterinary undergraduate teaching?

Institute of Veterinary, Animal and Biomedical Sciences, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand. T.J.Parkinson@massey.ac.nz

Knowles and colleagues have described teaching methods as being either teacher centered, with dependent learning (pedagogy), or learner centered, with independent learning underpinned by the learners' experience and intrinsic motivation (andragogy). This paper argues that both models can be recognized within veterinary undergraduate programs. Veterinary students enter the program with a high level of intrinsic motivation and are prepared to invest considerably in comprehending the material that is presented to them. While this should result in learners whose behavior fits the assumptions underlying andragogy, information overload, poor communication of the relevance of material, teaching by transmission, and examination by memorization often confine learning to the dependent learning characteristic of pedagogical approaches. Students' experience and practical ability should develop as they progress through the program. Drawing upon experience provides opportunities for both fleshing out and putting in context the declarative knowledge from the didactic components of the curriculum. Where this is achieved (either in the clinical or preclinical curriculum), students' motivation and interest is stimulated, resulting in andragogical responses of enhanced motivation and engagement with the subject. Pedagogy and andragogy can, however, be complementary, rather than antithetical. Students enter a new subject with minimal experience and little knowledge about it, so a pedagogical methodology may be the most efficient way of initiating understanding. However, as understanding develops, an andragogical method becomes more appropriate, progressively developing students' independence of learning. The cycle may repeat itself during the program, with the balance changing along with changes in knowledge, goals, experience, and context.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. D. Plant Incorporating an Audience Response System into Veterinary Dermatology Lectures: Effect on Student Knowledge Retention and Satisfaction J Vet Med Educ, January 1, 2007; 34(5): 674 - 677. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. J. Parkinson, M. Gilling, and G. T. Suddaby Workload, Study Methods, and Motivation of Students within a BVSc Program J Vet Med Educ, January 1, 2006; 33(2): 253 - 265. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

AAVMC APPRECIATES THE SUPPORT OF OUR TWO PATRONS, HILL'S PET NUTRITION AND BAYER ANIMAL HEALTH, WHO IN COMBINATION ARE FULLY SUPPORTING THIS SITE.